Tests are devices and means of evaluation, whereas
psychological tests are devices and means of making assessments. Major
categories of tests include mental ability, achievement, individual
achievement, personality, objective, and neuropsychological tests (Hogan,
2007). Fields involved in testing that are major users of testing are clinical
and school psychology, counseling, neuropsychology, education, employment, and
research (Hogan, 2007). The development of testing has occurred over numerous
years and testing improves and becomes more effective with each passing year.
Six major forces that influence the historical development of testing include
the scientific impulse, concern for the individual, practical applications,
statistical methodology, the rise of clinical psychology, and computers.
Two of these
forces that I find of particular interest in their historical significance are
the concern for the scientific impulse and clinical psychology. Throughout the
history of testing, the scientific impulse has triumphed. The concerns of the
scientific impulse are why it holds historical significance, that is, its
concerns as for testing being scientific and for scorer reliability (Hogan,
2007). Therefore, these concerns have been the motivation for developing early
and current achievement tests. Clinical psychology also has a historical
significance as for testing. Clinical psychology has been one of the main
fields of using testing and applying psychology and a scientific approach
toward testing. Therefore, clinical psychology utilizes the
scientist-practitioner model by maintaining its approach of being both
scientific and practical. Also, individuals in clinical practice have needed,
used, requested, and developed excessive amounts of tests. These are some of
the reasons of clinical psychology's historical significance.
Reference
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.