Sunday, November 17, 2013

According to the week's reading, can personality factors predict mortality? Why or why not?

          According to this week's reading personality factors are not a predictor of mortality, instead personality factors are a contributors of when diseases, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) will be diagnosed. Personality factors, such as neuroticism play a role in the diagnosis of cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The reason why is because Hans J. Eysenck and David Kissen during the early 1960, conducted research disproving this point but personality factors have an effect on and individual's mortality. Their research showed that individuals scoring low on neuroticism (N) on the Maudsley Personality Inventory had a tendency to prohibit his or her emotions, therefore these individuals are more likely than individuals who have a high neuroticism (N) score to receive a diagnosis of lung cancer later on in life (Feist & Feist, 2009). In 1996, Eysenck made the point whereas the study he conducted and other studies concerning the relationship between personality and disease cannot prove psychological factors predict mortality or cause diseases, such as heart disease and cancer. Such diseases that contribute to mortality are the result of interactions of several factors but personality factors cannot predict mortality.   
Reference
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of personality (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Friday, November 15, 2013

What are the characteristics of a healthy person according to Gordon Allport? How does this theory compare with Abraham Maslow’s concept of self-actualization?

     Gordon Willard Allport an American psychologist, as for personality Allport was one of the first psychologists to focus his or her work on it. Often Allport is referred to as a founding figure of personality psychology. According to Allport  the characteristics of healthy individuals consists of different aspects. Psychologically mature individuals possess characteristics of proactive behavior; whereas they react to external stimuli and have the capacity of consciously acting on his or her environment in both new and innovative means, which causes his or her environment to react to him or her (Feist & Feist, 2009). Proactive behavior is directed at reducing tensions and establishing new tensions. Also those that possess a mature personality are likely to be motivated by conscious processes rather than disturbed individuals. This allows one with a mature personality to be more autonomous and flexible unlike unhealthy individuals who are affected by unconscious motives from childhood experiences that dominate them (Feist & Feist, 2009). Individuals deemed healthy normally have relatively trauma-free childhood experiences.
     In comparison to Maslow’s theory of self-actualization, Allport emphasized an individual's uniqueness, and that individual's maturity is seen during different points in an individual's life; while Maslow's thought individuals had to go through a hierarchy of needs before reaching maturity.    
Reference
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of personality (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Most existential theorists, such as Rollo May and Irvin Yalom, believe that much of human behavior is motivated by an underlying sense of anxiety. According to them, what drives or creates this anxiety and do you agree with their theory? Why or why not?

     As for anxiety, Rollo May, American existential psychologist, referred to it as an individual's subjective state of becoming aware that his or her existence may be destroyed, whereas he or she may become nothing (Feist & Feist, 2009). When events or experiences threaten an individual's psychological or physical existence then he or she experiences existential anxiety. The strongest threat to an individual's existence is death. May and Irvin Yalom, American existential psychiatrist, argued that when an individual deals with the terror of death it is a major developmental task (Feist & Feist, 2009). Life is but a process of confronting and coping with an individual's death, which brings about anxiety. I do agree with their theory because some individuals suffer or go through a midlife crisis when dealing with anxiety when it comes to aging. Aging threatens an individual's psychological or physical existence and the result is that some individuals behave or are driven to behave in certain ways. Although, a midlife crisis does not affect every individual I still agree with their theory because at some point and time in life individuals experience existential anxiety. Specifically, when an individual asks him or herself or answers questions that concern personal and professional fulfillment in life or if a individual lacks or thinks he or she lacks the ability to fulfill personal and professional goals. These state of uncertainty can raise existential anxiety.  
Reference
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of personality (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Carl Rogers profoundly impacted the field of psychotherapy with his person-centered theory of personality. Explain Rogers’ concept of actualizing tendency and discuss what impacts an individual’s ability to realize it?

     Carl Rogers, American psychologist and founder of client-centered therapy, was more concerned with helping individuals instead of trying to discover why individuals behave as they did (Feist & Feist, 2009). Rogers was more concerned with helping an individual grow and develop instead of questioning why an individual developed how he or she did. Rogers developed his humanistic theory of personality from experiences as a practicing psychotherapist. Rogers was a theorists who called for empirical research in support of his both his personality theory and therapeutic approach. Rogers concept of actualizing tendency is the tendency within humans (that only motive individuals possess), animals, and plants to move toward fulfillment and completion of potentials (Feist & Feist, 2009). These motives are the needs of one to satisfy an individual's hunger drive, the expression of deep emotions when an individual feels those emotions, and the acceptance of self, which are the single motive of actualization examples (Feist & Feist, 2009). Actualization involves the entirety of an individual because every individual operates as one complete organism, which includes the individual and his or her intellectual and physiological, emotional and rational, unconscious and conscious (Feist & Feist, 2009). The concept of actualizing tendency is one whereas individuals have a potential to discover the realization of his or her personal abilities when one is provided with a climate of facilitative attitudes, which are psychological. 
Reference
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of personality (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Introduction to Personality

          One of the more so complex aspects of psychology is personality. Personality theorists have developed theories to explain personality. However, these theorists do not agree on a one definition of personality (Feist & Feist, 2009). Through each of the theories developed by these theorists one can gain a better understanding of personality and a personality definition. A personality definition; however, does not detail why an individual’s personality develops, therefore knowing what factors influence an individual’s personality development is key to understanding an individual’s personality.   
Definitions of Personality
          Defining personality is not a simple task because several theorists developed theories as for what personality is and why an individual’s personality develops. Sigmund Freud, Alfred Adler, Carl Jung, Melanie Klein, Karen Horney, Erich Fromm, Harry Stack Sullivan, Erik Erikson, and other theorists developed vital and unique theories because there was no agreement among them as for the nature of personality, and each had an individualist view of personality. Therefore, there is no single definition of personality agreed on by personality theorists. However, personality is a pattern of unique characteristics and relatively permanent traits, which are individuality and consistency to an individual’s behavior (Feist & Feist, 2009). Traits are what contribute to individual behavioral differences, behavioral consistency over time, and the behavioral stability across situations (Feist & Feist, 2009). Feist and Feist (2009), “traits may be unique, common to some group, or shared by the entire species, but their pattern is different for each individual” (p. 4). Therefore, each individual, although similar to other individuals in certain ways, have distinctive personalities. As for characteristics they are every individual’s unique qualities, which include attributes such as intelligence, physique, and temperament.
Factors that may Influence an Individual’s Personality Development
          An individual’s personality development and what factors influence it has been a topic of interest for personality theorists in psychology. Therefore, personality theorists developed several theories to describe the stages and steps that occur during personality development. Freud, one of the most influential thinkers of personality development, developed the stage theory of psychosexual development. Freud thought an individual’s personality developed in stages, which related to certain erogenous zones. Freud thought that when an individual failed to complete successfully any of the stages, he or she would have personality problems as adults. Freud thought individuals had barely any choice or no choice in the forming of personality. However, Adler developed individual psychology in disagreement of Freud, and thought individuals are responsible for who he or she is. Jung, also in disagreement of Freud thought an individual’s personality developed through a series of stages, (referred to as analytical psychology), which peak in self-realization or individuation.
          Of emphasizes was the second half of an individual’s life, or the time-frame after ages of 35 or 40, when individuals possess opportunities to bring certain aspects of personality to obtain self-realization (Feist & Feist, 2009). Klein developed object relations theory in opposition of Freud, whereas he emphasizes the importance of the first four to six months after birth, which contribute to an individual’s personality development. Klein thought that the drives of an infant, such as sex, hunger, and others direct toward an objects, such as a vagina, a breast, a penis, and so on. Horney developed psychoanalytic social theory, based on the assumptions whereas cultural and social conditions, particularly experiences during childhood, bare the responsibility of forming an individual’s personality. Fromm a student of Freudian psychoanalysis, who was also inspired by Horney, Karl Marx, and other social theorists, developed humanistic psychoanalysis. It emphasized that an individual’s personality development influences of history, sociobiological factors, class structure, and economics influence an individual’s personality development (Feist & Feist, 2009).
          Sullivan developed interpersonal theory, which emphasized the importance of developmental stages, such as infancy, childhood, juvenile era, preadolescence, early adolescence, late adolescence, and adulthood (Feist & Feist, 2009). Sullivan thought an individual develops personality within a social context. Erikson developed his Post-Freudian theory or eight-stage theory of human development built on Freud’s psychosexual development stages. Erikson focused on social relationships that affect personality development. His theory extends beyond childhood and looks at the development of an individual throughout his or her lifespan.
          Viewing the theories of these personality theorist and others, one sees how the formation of personality may form by different factors, whether biological or environmental. Basically, personality theorists do not agree on how an individual’s personality develops. Personality development seems to fall under the nature versus nurture debate because numerous factors influence an individual’s personality development, such as heredity and the environment. Heredity includes several internal factors, which may influence the development of personality. As for environmental factors that may influence personality development include experiences as a child and social interactions with other individuals. Several factors contribute to an individual’s personality development, whether as a means of heredity or the environment, which is evident because of the personality theories created by personality theorists.
Conclusion
          Personalities are patterns of unique characteristics and basically permanent traits, which are individuality and consistency to an individual’s behavior (Feist & Feist, 2009). Personality has no singular definition that is agreed on by personality theorists; however, an individual’s personality distinguishes him or her from any other individual, thus making an individual’s personality unique. Numerous factors, such as heredity, and the environment may influence the development of an individual’s personality, and understanding how these factors affect an individual helps to understand how personality develops. Personality theories help to understand how the development of personality occurs. Personality theories build foundations on heredity, social, and situational interactions, an individual’s response to environmental factors, and personal assumptions and observations.


Sunday, November 3, 2013

What are the similarities and differences between Freud’s and Jung’s theories on personality? Which theory do you believe is more applicable and why?

     From their first meeting in Vienna in 1907, Sigmund Freud and Carl Gustav Jung became friends and colleagues. Jung was even an admirer of Freud before and after their meeting. Theoretical differences ended the close relationship between Freud and Jung. Therefore, several similarities and differences exist between Freud’s and Jung’s theories on personality. Freud and Jung both based their personality theories on the assumption that the psyche or mind has both an unconscious and conscious level (Feist & Feist, 2009). Another similarity between Freud and Jung was that both thought the content of dreams needed to be interpreted, which would enable the effective treatment of patients. The main difference between Freud and Jung was that Freud thought sex was the motivating factor for psychological disorders and pathologies; while Jung thought that individual creates ideas that he or she tries to manifest in him or herself, which are the archetypes within one's psyche.
     I think that Jung's theory is more applicable and sex is important but it is not the main driving force in human nature as Freud thought. Jung's theory is more flexible as for the development of personalities, while Freud's is more structured and one dimensional. 
Reference
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of personality (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Saturday, November 2, 2013

After reading the week's material, do you agree or disagree with Freud’s belief that the most crucial developmental stage in personality formation is the infantile stage? Why or why not?

          I do agree with Sigmund Freud's belief that the most crucial developmental stage in personality formation is the infantile stage. The infantile stage occurs during one's first four or five years of life, and Freud thought this was the most crucial stage for an individual's personality formation. During this stage infants are in possession of a sexual life and go through a pregenital sexual development period (Feist & Feist, 2009). Freud thought the infantile stage occurred in three phases, which are the oral phase, anal phase, and phallic phase. During each phase the three primary erogenous zones undergo the most salient development (Feist & Feist, 2009). The first phase or oral phase occurs in infancy and the particular part of the body is the mouth. The second phase or anal phase occurs in early childhood and the particular part of the body is the anus. The third phase or phallic phase occurs in the preschool years and the particular part of the body is the penis. The infantile stage details how an individual's behaves and how aspects of one’s personality develop during each phase.   
Reference
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of personality (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.